fixes #684 bug in TDModesFromPolarizations after NewInterface
Description
This fixes an issue raised by @jacob.langue. After the merge of the new-interface, the function XLALSimInspiralTDModesFromPolarizations
did not work properly anymore. Running e.g. the snippet below,
import lal
import lalsimulation as lalsim
hlms = lalsim.SimInspiralTDModesFromPolarizations( \
100.0 * lal.MSUN_SI, 100 * lal.MSUN_SI, \
0.0, 0.0, 0.5, \
0.0, 0.0, -0.5, \
2000 * lal.PC_SI*1e6, 0.0, \
0.0, 0.0, 0.0, \
0.000244140625, 10, 10, \
None, 73)
threw the error
XLAL Error - XLALSimInspiralGenerateTDWaveform (../../../../git/lalsuite-new-interface-doxygen/lalsimulation/lib/LALSimInspiral.c:476): hplus and hcross must be pointers to NULL
XLAL Error - XLALSimInspiralGenerateTDWaveform (../../../../git/lalsuite-new-interface-doxygen/lalsimulation/lib/LALSimInspiral.c:476): Invalid argument
XLAL Error - XLALSimInspiralTDModesFromPolarizations (../../../../git/lalsuite-new-interface-doxygen/lalsimulation/lib/LALSimInspiral.c:952): Internal function call failed: Invalid argument
This happened because the new-interface explicitly checks that hplus, hcross are NULL here, this was not checked before.
With this fix, we declare hplus/hcross as NULL in the definition of XLALSimInspiralTDModesFromPolarizations
.
API Changes and Justification
Backwards Compatible Changes
-
This change does not modify any class/function/struct/type definitions in a public C header file or any Python class/function definitions -
This change adds new classes/functions/structs/types to a public C header file or Python module
Backwards Incompatible Changes
-
This change modifies an existing class/function/struct/type definition in a public C header file or Python module -
This change removes an existing class/function/struct/type from a public C header file or Python module
If any of the Backwards Incompatible check boxes are ticked please provide a justification why this change is necessary and why it needs to be done in a backwards incompatible way.
Review Status
Rerunning the code snippet above gives the expected result.