O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/o3a-review-report.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Main results review page: https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3
 |No.| NAME | Comments on config ini file|Comments on results from the reviewer | Reviewees comments |Final status|
 |---| ---- | ---- |  ---- | --- |--- |
 |1. |[GW190408a](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190408a)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu| |<br> Anuradha:<br>BBH run: In think there is a typo in labeling, it should be BBH not ks_pos.<br> ks_pos/ks_sym: The logL is different. S1z and S2z are broader than BBH run, and hence effective spin is broader than BBH run. Mtotal and Mc are shifted towards lower values. <br> <br> Archisman: looks fine. **SIGNED OFF!** <br> Anuradha: **SIGNED OFF!**|<br> Difference in SNR and logL are expected. [Discussion on matter-]most(https://chat.ligo.org/ligo/pl/n1rhn8sdt7g89muqe45iumdixa) <br> In order to make sure that the logL difference not affected our analsyis we can check the BFs and compare the one from PE Prod run and the one obtained from our BBH run. <br> In this case, log(BF)-PE PROD is 94.99 and SIQM-BH run is 95.2, hence no issues.| **SIGNED OFF!** |
-|2. |[GW190412m](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190412m)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu||<br>  Anuradha: <br> BBH run: Why log L is so different?<br>ks_pos: Why log L is so different? cos(alpha) is very different. chi_eff, q and Mc have shifted towards lower values. Mtotal and m1 are railing at the lower side. <br>ks_sym: Why log L is so different? Mtotal and m1 are railing at the lower side. q has shifted to higher values. <br> <br> Archisman: needs rerun with wider mtot prior. <br> <br> Archisman (on reruns): cosalpha?||Reruns are over. Waiting for comments from reviewers|
+|2. |[GW190412m](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190412m)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu||<br>  Anuradha: <br> BBH run: Why log L is so different?<br>ks_pos: Why log L is so different? cos(alpha) is very different. chi_eff, q and Mc have shifted towards lower values. Mtotal and m1 are railing at the lower side. <br>ks_sym: Why log L is so different? Mtotal and m1 are railing at the lower side. q has shifted to higher values. <br> <br> Archisman: needs rerun with wider mtot prior. <br> <br> Archisman (on reruns): cosalpha for pos? Looks good otherwise. ||Reruns are over. Waiting for comments from reviewers|
 |3. |[GW190425z](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190425z)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu|| Archisman: still running ||
 |4.|[GW190512b](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190512at)<br> person responsible: Krishnendu||<br> <br> Anuradha: BBH: Why log L is different? <br> <br> Archisman: whys is t0 different? Is the BH run used for comparison a non-spinning run? <br> <br> Archisman (following Krishnendu's first comment): This looks better, thanks! There is a minor mtot railing. We need to decide what to do for runs such as these. <br> <br> Archisman: for symmetric, mtotal is bimodal. **ATTENTION:** Rerun is necessary for this event. Railing of mtotal is clear on this [postproc](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/S190512at/pv2_c01_prod/sym/ks/1241719652.42-0/V1H1L1/posplots.html) page. | <br> Krishnendu <br> Yes, this is now being addressed. I used Prod4 results for comparison and which was a non-spinning run. Now it is fixed. <br> <br> Krishnendu: <br> logL difference will not affect this case as well (BFs 53.17 [bh case](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/S190512at/pv2_c01_prod/bh/1241719652.42-0/V1H1L1/posplots.html) and 52.14 [ks_pos](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/S190512at/pv2_c01_prod/pos/ks/1241719652.42-0/V1H1L1/posplots.html) )<br> <br> Krishnendu: Currently, I am passing the following in the [config file](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/S190512at/pv2_c01_prod/config/Prod0_IMRPP_S190512at_Ks_pos.ini) for the mass parameters. The config file for [Prod0 config file](https://git.ligo.org/pe/O3/S190512at/-/tree/master/C01_offline) also uses the same q-min = 0.125, mtotal-min = 40, mtotal-max = 65. In [this](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/S190512at/pv2_c01_prod/comp_PE_Prod0_cbcBayesCompPos/bh_bh/), the BH run using our settings is compared with the PE-Prod0 results. Both the runs give almost same mtotal, mchirp posteriors (no prior railing) but for [ks_pos](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/S190512at/pv2_c01_prod/comp_PE_Prod0_cbcBayesCompPos/bh_ks_pos/) and[ks_sym](https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~nv.krishnendu/LSC/lalinference/O3/o3_a_tgr/S190512at/pv2_c01_prod/comp_PE_Prod0_cbcBayesCompPos/bh_ks_sym/) cases there is a difference in the mchip estimate and the total mass shifted to lower mass end. <br> Any suggestion for rerun will be useful <br> <br> Rerun started with extending mtotal from mtotal-min = 20 to mtotal-max = 65 <br> Runs are over and waiting for results |Reruns are over. Waiting for comments from reviewers|
 |5.|[GW190521r](https://git.ligo.org/nv.krishnendu/lalsuite/-/wikis/O3a-Spin-Quadrupole-BH-mimicker-test-results/S190521r) <br> person responsible: Krishnendu|  | <br>Anuradha:<br> BBH: Why log L is different? <br> ks_pos: Why log L is different? q is shifted toward lower side. 1D ks plot is missing on the posplots.html page. <br> ks_sym: Why log L is different? 1D ks plot is missing on the posplots.html page. <br> <br> Archisman: Spins and spin angles are different (expected). Looks good. **SIGNED OFF!** <br><br> Anuradha: looks good. **SIGNED OFF** || **SIGNED OFF!**|