Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Jul 07, 2020
  2. Jun 29, 2020
  3. Jun 24, 2020
  4. Jun 16, 2020
  5. May 26, 2020
  6. May 23, 2020
  7. May 22, 2020
  8. May 21, 2020
  9. May 20, 2020
  10. May 19, 2020
  11. May 12, 2020
  12. May 11, 2020
  13. May 08, 2020
    • Christopher Wipf's avatar
      Fix coating brownian so it agrees with Hong · f68697f9
      Christopher Wipf authored
      The small remaining discrepancy between Hong and gwinc is due to
      an error in gwinc's implementation of the Yam et al model.
      
      The coefficient in front of the phase derivative `dcdp_z` is
      supposed to be `nN` (as written correctly in Yam et al, eq 1),
      not `nN/2` (as found in gwinc).
      
      In Hong et al, the coefficient is `nN/2`, but that's because
      their phases are defined as one-way instead of round-trip (see
      Yam et al, eq A2).
      
      After correcting the error, gwinc and Hong agree, as expected,
      for the case of equal bulk and shear losses and no
      photoelasticity.
      f68697f9
  14. May 04, 2020
Loading